Dr. Dootlittle (lol) talks about a guy who couldn't text and talk at the same time and approaches it from a working memory perspective. He describes the working memory as having four parts. It can store immediate experiences and knowledge, it allows us pull back long term memories, it helps us process our goals, and processes and manipulates our memories. Our working memory capacity can have effects on us. People with a high working memory capacity are known to be good story tellers, do well on standardized tests, have high level writing abilities, and can reason at high levels. Then, Peter asks the audience to perform a few tests to play with their working memories. He tells them to remember 5 words: tree, highway, mirror, saturn, and electrode. He then asks them what 23x8 is. He asks them to count on their left hand and recite the last 5 letters of the english alphabet backward. He then asks the audience how many words they remember. Only about half of the people raised their hands.
Dr. Doolittle says that our working memory allows us to make sense of the world around us, but it has limitations. It has limited capacity and limited duration. We can only remember things for about 4 things for about 10-20 seconds unless we do something with that information. We can apply it to something or even just talk to someone about it.
He says that we need to process what's going on the moment it happens. We need to practice, apply, and talk to others about new information. We need to think elaborately. We need to make connections with information and use imagery when thinking. We need to structure what we're doing in ways it makes sense. We also need to support information over time as it changes. His take home message is that what we process, we learn and if we're not processing life, we're not living it.
Eh. Seems a bit fluffy to me--like obviously if we're not processing life then we're not perceiving and then we're really just not taking in everything around us. That's basically like being in a coma. I think his point was more to just show the people how our memory works and some ways to improve your working memory. It was just a bit short for a crash course on memory.
Anyway, what do you guys think about his message? Did it inspire you? Personally I found it a bit weak for a Ted talk. The the video is posted below--take a look if you want.
Alyssa, I found this TED Talk interesting. I see his point here and I see how he's trying to explain the wonderful intricacies of memory. He's also emphasizing that the human memory and encoding processes are integral parts of life. Yeah, it is like being in a coma. While this talk and its message might seem weak at face value, it reminded me of something Lily said in class. She was talking about how, over the course of our study of psychology, we have learned about how amazing and complicated the human mind is. In comparison, the working memory is fleeting and requires more effort to turn those memories into long-term memories. He's not wrong when he says that we need to process what's around us. Sure, it's inspirational in some sense. Actually, it's more of a reality check than an inspirational speech.
ReplyDelete